Legal Opinion

Koubek v. Tenos

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1941No. Appeal, 187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

This is a proceeding for possession of real estate, under the Act of April 20,1905, P. L. 239,12 PS section 2571 et seq., brought by the purchaser at foreclosure sale. A verdict for the petitioner was directed. This appeal comes from judgment on the verdict.

The appellant, Teños, based his right to retain possession on (1) a claim of ownership of an undivided half interest by an unrecorded agreement with the mortgagor antedating the mortgage; (2) possession at and prior to the execution of the mortgage; and (3) express notice to the mortgagee, before taking the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caveny v. CurtisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Kinch Et Ux. v. FlukeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. White v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Rowe v. ReamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Moyer v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sidle v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. In Re GravesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Anela v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance AgencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Bishop v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  5. Bishop v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API