Legal Opinion

Moyer v. Diehl

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1937No. Appeal, 273PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is a proceeding under the Act of April 20, 1905, P. L. 239 (12 PS 2571) by the purchasers of real estate at a sheriff’s sale to obtain possession of the premises. The original action was one to foreclose a mortgage given by Emory Diehl and Calvin Diehl, and the procedure was by scire facias sur mortgage and a writ of levari facias. One of the original mortgagors, Calvin Diehl, had died intestate before these proceedings were instituted, leaving to survive him a widow and five sons. Emory Diehl and the widow and her five sons were made defendants in the scire facias…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tryon v. MunsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. Federal Land Bank of Balto. v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Simpson v. MeyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Schuldt v. Reading Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Herron ex rel. Murray v. StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dicarlo v. LiciniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Moyer v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Koubek v. TenosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Smith, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
  5. N.C. Ross v. D.B. RossCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API