Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bishop v. Bishop

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 1, 1958No. 12431Published

1DissentBiggs, Chief Judge

My views in this case differ substantially from those of my colleagues:(1) As to Fraud: There is ample evidence in the record to sustain the conclusion of the court below that Corey Bishop (Cornelius Below) induced Mildred Bishop by fraud to sign the deed naming Kelly, Ethel Bishop’s attorney, as “trustee”, and that Kelly was a party thereto, Mildred Bishop not knowing that Kelly was Ethel Bishop’s lawyer. D.C.V.I.1957, 152 F.Supp. 4, 7-8. The fraud of an agent or attorney is imputable to his principal. The obvious reason, as the court below found, for not including the cestui’s name in the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Rivera v. White, GuardianTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hanscom v. IrwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API