Legal Opinion

Sidle v. Kaufman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1942No. Appeal, 152PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill in equity to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate consisting of a house and lot in the Borough of Brownsville, Pennsylvania.

Nathan Kaufman purchased the property in dispute for residence purposes, in 1923, taking title in the name of his wife, Dora Kaufman. Early in 1938 the Kaufmans offered to sell the property to Samuel S. Sidle for f10,000, and Sidle expressed a desire to buy at this figure if given three years to make payment. A lease agreement was entered into, dated March…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Kinch Et Ux. v. FlukeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Spratt v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. ProffittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Walton v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Suchan Et Ux. v. SwopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Long John Silver's, Inc. v. FioreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Roth v. HartlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API