Davis v. . Mecklenburg County
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.
“When the Industrial Commission concludes that an injury arose out of and in the course of the employment of a claimant and such conclusion is supported by competent testimony, neither the Superior Court nor this Court may interfere therewith. Marsh v. Bennett College, 212 N. C., 662; Wimbish v. Detective Co., 202 N. C., 800. Likewise, when the Commission finds that the evidence is insufficient to support such conclusion and it finds that the injury relied upon by the plaintiff as a basis for compensation did not arise out of and in the course of the employment of the plaintiff, such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lockey v. . Cohen, Goldman Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Marsh v. Bennett College for WomenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Wimbish v. Home Detective Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bryan v. T. A. Loving Co. & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Hardy v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Lassiter v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Horn v. SANDHILL FURNITURE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Blevins v. . TeerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.