Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Furrey

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1900No. L.A. No. 714PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

Appeal from judgment on judgment-roll with out a bill of exceptions.

The plaintiffs furnished material in the construction of a building, and, three hundred and fifty dollars and fifteen cents of the contract price thereof remaining unpaid, they brought this action on the contractor’s bond given in pursuance of section 1203 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and obtained judgment for that sum. Appellants are the sureties on said bond.

1. The obligation sued on was not a mere offer of guaranty, depending for its binding force upon a notice of acceptance, but it was a contractor’s bond…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Coburn v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Treweek v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gibbs v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Melander v. Western National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Shaughnessy v. American Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API