Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Exnicious

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 10744PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

Plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Goewey Investment Company, a corporation, brought an action to recover certain sums of money, together with interest, from the defendant Exnieious, as receiver of the investment company, and the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, as surety on the receiver’s bond. The allegations of the complaint, in substance, are that in an action brought by a stockholder against the Goewey Investment Company the superior court purported to make its order appointing Exnieious as receiver of the company, but that the court had no jurisdiction in the action, “and that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Sullivan v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Loop Lumber Co. v. Van Loben SelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. People v. MatuszewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Shaughnessy v. American Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. Old Republic Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Stowe v. MatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Wiseman v. Sierra Highland Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bookasta v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. ExniciosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API