Legal Opinion

People v. McCall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1910No. Docket No. 38PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Kalkaska; L’amb, J. George McCall was convicted of violating the local-option law.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The respondent was charged with violating the local-option law in force in Kalkaska county by giving and furnishing to one David Yipond a quantity of spirituous and intoxicating liquors, to wit, whisky, on the 25th day of June, 1909, at the village of Kalkaska, Mich. The court refused to take the case from the jury, as requested by the respondent. The jury returned a verdict of guilty.

The important assignments of error are:(1) Did the court err in refusing to direct a verdict of not guilty at the close of the proof on the part of the people when the people rested their case, as requested by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GiddingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. BudzanMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API