Legal Opinion

Mancuso v. Mancuso

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1942No. Appeal, 254PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rhodes, J.,

Opinion by

In this workmen’s compensation case the referee made an award, in favor of claimant. The board found claimant had not established that an accident occurred, and sustained defendant’s appeal. . On appeal by claimant the court of common pleas agreed with the board and entered judgment for defendant. This appeal by claimant followed.

Claimant is disabled as the result of a reversed spondylolisthesis, which is a condition where the fifth lumbar vertebra has slipped backward from the sacrum. He had a congenital condition which gave him a potentially weak back in that area.

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Monahan v. Seeds & DurhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Henzel v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hurlburt v. Fidelity Window Cleaning Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Lingle v. Lingle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Davis v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Baur v. Mesta Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API