Legal Opinion

Crispin v. Leedom Worrall Co. (Et Al.)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1941No. Appeal, 34PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,

In this workmen’s compensation case, we allowed an appeal from the Superior Court where an award was made in claimant’s favor.

The facts essential to the determination of defendant’s liability are these: Claimant, a laborer in defendant’s warehouse, fifty-eight years of age, was engaged with another employee in pushing from an electric elevator a truck weighing with its load approximately 1800 pounds. Because of the weight of the truck and its contents, the elevator, operated by automatic con trol, came to rest, according to claimant’s estimate, an inch to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Lesko v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bernard S. Pincus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Royko v. Logan Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Nelson v. Borough of GreenvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API