Legal Opinion

Lennon v. . Habit

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Passing tbe fact tbat tbe interpretations placed by defendants on a number of tbe substantial allegations in tbe complaint lead to statements and assumptions in tbe demurrer contradictory to these allegations, fairly interpreted, we do not agree with tbe interpretation which tbe court below evidently placed upon tbe contract, nor with tbe legal inferences which it drew in sustaining tbe demurrer.

It is not necessary to set out in great detail tbe considerations which have led us to this conclusion, but we do not regard tbe contract as requiring the full payment of tbe purchase price within the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Bryant Timber Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Davis v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Samonds v. CloningerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Samonds v. . CloningerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Watson Bros. Transp. Co. v. JaffaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. McLean v. KeithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. McAden v. . CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Douglass v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API