Legal Opinion

Samonds v. . Cloninger

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff alleges that defendant executed, 20 August, 1923, an option whereby the defendant gave, for sixty days, the plaintiff an option to purchase the locus in quo at the price of $10,000 net, payable "$2,500 in cash and balance, $5,000, in B. L., $2,500 on second mortgage for 2 years." The option provided that the defendant would execute and deliver a deed in fee with full covenants of warranty and seisin, and free from all encumbrances. It was further stipulated that, upon a failure to exercise the option within the time (60 days), the obligation would be null and void.

It appears in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Weaver v. BurrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Newcomb v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McAden v. . CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. McAden v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Byrd v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Lennon v. . HabitSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API