Douglass v. Brooks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Appellants do not assign as error the denial of their motions for judgment of involuntary nonsuit. However, they seek indirectly to avail themselves of the accepted rule that a motion for judgment of involuntary nonsuit will be allowed when there is a material variance between allegation and proof. Andrews v. Bruton, ante, 93, 86 S.E. 2d 786, and cases cited. Their contention is that the judgment should be reversed because the trial judge submitted the case to the jury on a theory at variance with the cause of action alleged by plaintiff. In passing, it is noted that a new trial, rather than…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Bateman v. Kramer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Faw v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Winders v. . KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brannock v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Childress v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Ford v. HoferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. MedfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Millikan v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.