Legal Opinion

Samonds v. Cloninger

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYarser, J.

Tbis case presents only tbe question wbetber, upon all tbe evidence, viewed in its most favorable aspect for tbe plaintiff, there was any evidence sufficient to support a verdict for tbe plaintiff upon tbe issues necessary to bis recovery.

Tbe defendant offered no testimony, and bis allegations that present an affirmative defense are not material to tbis discussion further than as bis explanation of transaction.

The option in tbe instant case is under seal and extends sixty days from tbe date. It is a continuing offer to sell for tbe period named- — • sixty days. We find in tbe instant record…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Weaver v. BurrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Newcomb v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McAden v. . CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. McAden v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Byrd v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Wade v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API