Legal Opinion
People v. O'DELL
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 2005No. C046576PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
After defendant Marc Evan O’Dell was found incompetent to stand trial, the court set his maximum term of confinement in a state hospital at three years pursuant to Penal Code section 1370, subdivision (c)(1). In a subsequent proceeding the court issued an order authorizing Napa State Hospital (hospital) to involuntarily administer antipsychotic medication to him.
Defendant appeals, claiming: (1) there was no substantial evidence to support the authorization to involuntarily administer antipsychotic medication to him; (2) the court erred in calculating his maximum…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. Daniel R. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Bushling v. Fremont Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. ChristianaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. McDuffieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. LameedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.