Legal Opinion

People v. McDuffie

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 2006No. A111738PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Van McDuffie appeals from a trial court order authorizing the involuntary administration of antipsychotic medications in order to render him competent to stand trial. McDuffie argues on appeal that the trial court’s order is not supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, should be reversed. We conclude the record does not contain substantial evidence that it is “substantially likely” the involuntary administration of medication to McDuffie will render him competent to stand trial. Therefore, we reverse.

II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. In Re QawiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Riese v. St. Mary's Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. United States v. Rivera-MoralesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BarzeeUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. ChristianaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. State v. CantrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. Lishan WangSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. People v. Howell CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API