Carter v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, Acting P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Robert Carter, a criminal defendant facing violent felony charges, was found incompetent to stand trial. The trial court then authorized a state hospital to administer antipsychotic drugs against his will in an effort to restore his competency. Under Sell v. United States (2003) 539 U.S. 166 [156 L.Ed.2d 197, 123 S.Ct. 2174] (Sell), orders of this sort are constitutionally permissible only if they satisfy strict criteria. Otherwise, an accused has a due process liberty interest that protects against being involuntarily medicated. We hold the trial court’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. PettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. ChristianaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. LameedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Conservatorship of S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.