Legal Opinion

Carter v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 2006No. B182641PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, Acting P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Robert Carter, a criminal defendant facing violent felony charges, was found incompetent to stand trial. The trial court then authorized a state hospital to administer antipsychotic drugs against his will in an effort to restore his competency. Under Sell v. United States (2003) 539 U.S. 166 [156 L.Ed.2d 197, 123 S.Ct. 2174] (Sell), orders of this sort are constitutionally permissible only if they satisfy strict criteria. Otherwise, an accused has a due process liberty interest that protects against being involuntarily medicated. We hold the trial court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. PettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. People v. ChristianaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. LameedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Conservatorship of S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API