Legal Opinion

People v. Christiana

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2010No. E048681PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant John Thomas Christiana appeals from orders following special proceedings to determine competency (Pen. Code,1 § 1368) and to authorize involuntary administration of psychotropic medication (§ 1370). He argues that (1) he had a constitutional right to testify at his competency hearing, and the denial of that right was reversible error; and (2) the trial court’s authorization to involuntarily administer antipsychotic medication to him was not supported by substantial evidence. We reject the first contention but find merit to the second,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. Herbert G. Evans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. United States v. Hernandez-VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. PettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. People v. LameedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. (PC) Bennett v. Monroe Detention CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. D.K. v. Office of Admin. HearingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API