Legal Opinion

People v. Lameed

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 2016No. H042399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MÁRQUEZ, J.

Defendant Nurudeen Abiodun Lameed was charged with domestic violence (Pen. Code, 1 § 273.5, sub. (a)) and other felony offenses. Six months later, the court declared a doubt as to his competence, suspended criminal proceedings, and ordered that he be evaluated by a neuropsychologist and a psychiatrist. Both experts reported that defendant was mentally incompetent to stand trial, that it was medically appropriate to treat defendant with antipsychotic medication, and that defendant did not have the capacity to make decisions about such medication. Based on the reports, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. Abisai Rivera-GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. People v. O'DELLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cal. Dept. of State Hospitals at Coalinga v. T.F. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. D.K. v. Office of Admin. HearingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API