Legal Opinion

Preast v. McGill

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided September 10, 1999No. CIV. A. 2:98-1089PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HALLANAN, Senior District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court are Defendants United States Deputy Marshal John Gainer’s (“Deputy Gainer”) and United States Deputy Marshal Brian McGill’s (“Deputy McGill”) Motions to Dismiss or Alternatively for Summary Judgment which were filed separately and based upon separate grounds. Plaintiff, Ronald Preast filed a Response to Defendant McGill’s Motion to Dismiss. However, it appears to the Court that Plaintiffs Response should be a response to Deputy Gainer’s Motion to Dismiss and not Deputy McGill’s as the grounds set forth therein respond…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartram v. WolfeDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001
  2. Krider v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2000
  3. Ali v. Raleigh CountyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018
  4. Gaetani v. HadleyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  5. Richison v. ChapmanDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API