Legal Opinion

Bartram v. Wolfe

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided July 12, 2001No. Civ.A. 2:99-0490PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

HADEN, Chief Judge.

This action was previously referred to the Honorable Mary Stanley Feinberg, United States Magistrate Judge, who has submitted her Proposed Findings and Recommendation (PF & R) pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and setting the case for trial. Defendant has objected and Plaintiff has responded.

Plaintiff alleges Fourth and Fifth Amendment claims arising out of his arrest and detention on state charges.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Beaufort CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
  2. David Lee v. City of PortsmouthDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API