Legal Opinion

Williams v. Spitzer Autoworld Canton, L.L.C.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2009No. 2008-1337PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} This case presents the question of whether the purchaser of an automobile may use parol evidence to contradict the terms of a final written purchase agreement in a Consumer Sales Practices Act action against an automobile dealer who allegedly failed to integrate an oral representation into the final written purchase agreement. Absent fraud, mistake, or other invalidating cause, a final written agreement may not be contradicted by evidence of a prior or contemporaneous oral agreement, and therefore a consumer may not use parol evidence to contradict the final written agreement to prove a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ed Schory & Sons, Inc. v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Carroll v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Curtis v. DeCorpsOhio Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Anderson v. Barclay's Capital Real Estate, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Paulus v. Beck Energy Corp., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Monroe County2017
  5. Shumaker v. Hamilton Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API