Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Curtis v. DeCorps
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1938No. 26840PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
The question submitted is whether the civil service commission of a municipality has the power to make a regulation which would require the appointing authority to lay off employees in the inverse order of appointment.
That portion of Section 486-19, General Code, which is here pertinent, reads:
‘ ‘ Such municipal commission shall prescribe, amend and enforce rules not inconsistent with the provisions of this act for the classification of positions in the civil service of such city and city school district; for examinations and registrations therefor; and for appointments,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Williams v. State Ex Rel. GribbenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Lexington ex rel. Menefee v. Commercial BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- City of Portland v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. EchazabalSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Williams v. Spitzer Autoworld Canton, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.