Legal Opinion

Schoenfelder v. Arizona Bank

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 25, 1989No. 1 CA-CIV 9925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERBER, Judge.

The Arizona Bank (Bank) appeals from the entry of partial summary judgment for G.P. Schoenfelder which ordered the Bank to recredit the checking account of Apex Development Corporation (Apex) for four checks paid over Schoenfelder’s forged signature. Because we hold that Schoenfelder does not have standing as a customer of the Bank under A.R.S. §§ 47-4104(A)(5) and 47-4401, we need not address other issues raised by the Bank on appeal.

FACTS

In April 1986, G.P. Schoenfelder, as seller, and Apex Development Corporation, as buyer, were nearing the close of escrow on a four-acre…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Kendall Yacht Corp. v. United California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Girard BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. First National Bank of Springdale v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Medford Irrigation District v. Western BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schoenfelder v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Parrett v. Platte Valley State Bank & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Haroutunian v. ValueoptionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API