Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Girard Bank
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN MORGAN DAVIS, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
This is a diversity action brought by plaintiff insurer, as subrogee, to recover sums allegedly improperly debited from its insured’s checking account by the defendant. Before the-court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56. 1 After reviewing the memoranda in regard to the respective motions and holding oral arguments, for the reasons which follow, defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be denied while the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment will be granted.
The following facts are…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenville Business Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. LototskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Lema v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Schoenfelder v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Majestic Building Maintenance, Inc. v. Huntington Bancshares Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.