Legal Opinion
Parrett v. Platte Valley State Bank & Trust Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1990No. 88-654PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Robert Parrett appeals from the judgment of the district court for Buffalo County which sustained the demurrer of Platte Valley State Bank & Trust Co. and dismissed Parrett’s suit.
*140“When ruling on a demurrer, a court must assume that the pleaded facts, as distinguished from legal conclusions, are true as alleged and must give the pleading the benefit of any reasonable inference from the facts alleged, but cannot assume the existence of a fact not alleged, make factual findings to aid the pleading, or consider evidence which might be adduced at trial.”
Security Inv. Co. v. State, 231 Neb. 536,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Loucks v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Kendall Yacht Corp. v. United California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- First National Bank of Springdale v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Meyerson v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ads Associates Group, Inc. v. Oritani Savings Bank (069987)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- Ads Associates Group, Inc. v. Oritani Savings Bank (069987)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- Parrett v. PLATTE VALLEY STATE BANK & TR.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990