Legal Opinion
Loucks v. Albuquerque National Bank
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1966No. 7806PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
La FEL E. OMAN; Judge, Court of Appeals.
The plaintiffs-appellants, Richard A. Loucks and Del Martinez, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs,' Mr. Loucks and Mr." Martinez, respectively, were partners engaged in a business at Albuquerque, New Mexico, under the partnership name of L & M Paint and Body Shop.
By their complaint they sought both compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of the partnership, on behalf of Mr. Loucks, and on- behalf of Mr. Martinez against the defendants-appellees, Albuquerque National Bank and W. J. Kopp, hereinafter referred to as defendants, the bank, and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Stewart v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Weaver v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Valley National Bank v. WitterArizona Supreme Court · 1942
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Buckley v. Trenton Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. Robert L. Weaver, John C. Weaver and Sons and Weaver Farms, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Black Canyon Racquetball Club, Inc. v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Paiz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.