Legal Opinion
Glymph v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 27, 2005No. CIV.A.01-1333(JMF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
On May 1, 2003, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. I have already determined, by my Order of May 7, 2003, that relief in this case will consist of $50,000 in compensatory damages, in accordance with the jury’s verdict, and attorneys fees. I have also already determined that plaintiff is entitled to back pay and injunctive relief. Defining how to determine back pay and the precise nature of the injunctive relief to be awarded necessitated my holding an evidentiary hearing. I am now ready to issue my…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Thomas R. Lussier v. Marvin Runyon, United States Postmaster General, Thomas R. Lussier v. Marvin Runyon, United States Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Peyton, Monica M. v. DiMario, Michael F.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Walter J. Lander v. Manuel Lujan, Secretary, U.S. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carmen Jean-Baptiste v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Banks v. PerdueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019