Legal Opinion
Carmen Jean-Baptiste v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 19, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1587PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
A jury found for plaintiff Carmen Jean-Baptiste on her Title VII and D.C. Human Rights Act (DCHRA) sexual harassment claims, her Title VII and DCHRA retaliation claims, and her D.C. Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) claims. Jean-Baptiste now moves [187] for equitable relief pursuant to those three statutes.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are outlined in detail in the Court’s April 2013 Memorandum Opinion denying the District’s motion for a new trial and granting a motion for remittitur. See Jean-Baptiste v. Dist. of Columbia, 931…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barnett v. PA Consulting Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Robinson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Craig v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Garcia-Colon v. Corporation of the State Insurance FundDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.