Legal Opinion

Smith v. County of Washington

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1965PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiffs, homeowners in Washington County, sued to enjoin ① the rezoning of a tract of residential land so that it could be used for manufacturing. The trial court held that rezoning was a legislative matter, and that, on the facts of the case, the proposed action by the county commissioners was not subject to judicial intervention. Plaintiffs appeal.

The tract in question contains 4.3 acres and is surrounded by land that was and is zoned for residential use as part of a comprehensive plan of development adopted by Washington County in 1959. Most of the land visible from the site in question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Holt v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Dennis Et Ux v. City of OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Neuberger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Roseta v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API