Legal Opinion

Holt v. City of Salem

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1951PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

Suit for a declaratory decree that an ordinance of Salem, Oregon, changing a portion of a Class I, Besidential District Zone to Class IIIX, Bestricted Business District Zone, is unconstitutional, and for an injunction.

Plaintiffs are the owners of residence property within an area of Salem which had been established as a Class I, Besidential District Zone. On March 14, 1949, the defendant, Portland General Electric Company, an Oregon corporation engaged in the business of generating, selling and distributing electrical energy in Salem and elsewhere in Oregon as a public utility, filed with the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Michigan-Lake Building Corp. v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Huff v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Roseta v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Smith v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API