Legal Opinion

Dennis Et Ux v. City of Oswego

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This case involves the validity of a zoning ordinance adopted by defendant city. The trial court sustained the ordinance and plantiffs appeal. Plaintiffs alleged that the city council acted in an unlawful, arbitrary and capricious manner to oppress plaintiffs when the city adopted the contested ordinance. Other issues are raised but the only real question is that presented by the allegations of arbitrary and capricious action. The ordinance rezoned a part of the commercial area of the city and eliminated automobile service stations as a permissive business within the “downtown” portion of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. Shaffner v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Oregon Investment Co. v. SchrunkOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Multnomah County v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Perkins v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API