Legal Opinion

Roseta v. County of Washington

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1969PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a declaratory judgment suit brought to test the validity of the action of the Board of Commissioners of Washington County in rezoning a parcel of land owned by defendant Vera Schmitt. The trial court entered a decree declaring the action of the Board void on the ground that it constituted: “spot zoning” and enjoining defendant Schmitt from erecting any building inconsistent with the existing zone.

Defendant Schmitt is the owner of Tax lots 200, 201, 202 and 203. She had constructed an apartment building on Lots 200, 201 and 202 prior to the enactment of the original zoning ordinance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Wakefield v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Offutt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  4. Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. American Oil Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Anderson v. PedenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Green v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API