Legal Opinion
Page Et Ux. v. City of Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1945PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, C. J.
This is a suit to enjoin the enforcement of an amendatory zoning ordinance of the City of Portland purporting to reclassify two lots, owned by the defendant Hughes, so as to permit their use for business purposes. The lots were formerly in Zone I, or a residential district. If the ordinance is sustained, they will be changed to Zone III, or a business district. The plaintiffs, who are home-owners in the residential district and whose property is 100 feet north of the north line of the lots in question, challenge the validity of the ordinance on the ground that it is an arbitrary and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Wakefield v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Cassel v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.