Legal Opinion

Rempel v. United Parcel Service General Service Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 12, 2004No. 01-36124; D.C. No. CV-01-00142-HAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM*

Appellant David Rempel, M.D., M.P.H. (“Rempel”), challenges the district court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of Appellees.

The disputed provision of the confidentiality agreement provides in pertinent part:

Use of Confidential Information.... Claimants shall not use any Confidential Information, nor disclose or publish such Confidential Information for any purpose whatsoever. Results of the inspection [of DIADs or DVAs] by claimants shall not be disclosed for any purposes other than product liability litigation involving DIAD or DVA brought by package car drivers.

In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In re the Marriage of WatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API