Ruth v. Krone
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action on a promissory note for the sum of $2,000, alleged in the complaint to have been executed by the defendant, Lotta Buth Krone, in favor of and payable to the plaintiff.
The cause was tried by a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the face of the note, with legal in terest from the date of its maturity, said note, dated June 3, 1903, having been made payable three years after its date, without interest.
Judgment was entered for the plaintiff in accordance with the terms of the verdict.
This appeal is prosecuted from said judgment and from the order denying…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Scott v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Everding v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Prater v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Estate of PlautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Low v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Boyle v. Coast Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.