Legal Opinion

Everding v. Hutchinson

California Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1903No. S.F. No. 3252PublishedCited by 29 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Otto turn Suden, and Webber & Rutherford, for Appellants. Thomas B. Hutchinson, and Percy S. King, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is a contest of the probate of a will alleged to have been executed by Hannah T. Langley, deceased, on the twenty-second day of' February, 1901. The proponent of the will is John Everding, named therein as executor. The contestants are Thomas B. Hutchinson and Sarah de Pratie, the former named as executor, and the latter as legatee, in a prior will, alleged by them to have been made by said Hannah T. Langley, on the eighteenth day of April, 1900. The contest was upon various grounds, and, among others, that the testatrix, at the time of the making of the proposed will of February, 1901,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Estate of ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Estate of PlautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Low v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In Re O'brien's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API