Legal Opinion

Low v. Low

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1945No. L. A. No. 19038PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Louis Plaut died testate at the age of 80 years. Surviving him were a daughter, his only heir at law, and her son and daughter. Two months before his death he added a codicil to his will giving his nurse, respondent herein, $15,000. After the admission to probate of the will and codicil, testator’s granddaughter filed a petition praying that the probate of the codicil be revoked on the ground of undue influence. The probate court sustained respondent’s demurrer to the petition on the ground that petitioner was not an interested person within the meaning of section 380 of the Probate Code and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Thornagel v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Estate of ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Estate of PlautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API