Legal Opinion

In Re the Adoption of E.N.R.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2001PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HolderHolder, J.

in which ANDERSON, C.J., and DROWOTA, BIRCH, and BARKER, JJ., joined.

The parental rights of Timothy Ray Rose, a convicted rapist serving a twelve-year sentence, were terminated by the trial court pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113. On appeal, Mr. Rose challenged the constitutionality of § 36 — 1—113(g)(6) and § 36-l-113(c)(2), which permit termination of an inmate’s parental rights under certain circumstances. Mr. Rose’s constitutional challenge, however, was raised for the first time in closing argument before the trial court. Accordingly, we hold that the constitutional challenge…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. BallardTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Richardson v. Tennessee Board of DentistryTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hawk v. HawkTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lawrence Ex Rel. Powell v. StanfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dorrier v. DarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by108 opinions

  1. Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mary C. Smith v. UHS of Lakeside, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re: Kaliyah S.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Lynch v. City of JellicoTennessee Supreme Court · 2006

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API