Legal Opinion

Ehlinger v. Clark

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1928No. 4670PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This suit was instituted by Fayette County, through its county judge, against I. E. Clark, to recover the amount due upon two notes, each for the sum of $2000.00, executed by the defendant in error in favor of John P. Ehlinger, County Judge of Fayette County. The defense was that the Commissioners’ Court of Fayette County was forbidden by law to enter into the contract and agreement out of which the notes arose, and that the notes were therefore illegal and void. Upon trial before the court without a jury, the defense was sustained, and recovery on the notes denied. The county appealed the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. American Indemnity Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Imperial Irrigation Co. v. JayneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Delta County v. BlackburnTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. First National Bank of Eagle Lake v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Kuper v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dodson v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Short v. W. T. Carter & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1939

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API