Legal Opinion

Kuper v. Schmidt

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1960No. A-7457PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

On the first question presented by this appeal, we hold that where one of two joint owners of a negotiable instrument brings suit thereon after placing the same in the hands of attorneys for collection and is required to and does join the other owner as an involuntary plaintiff, the former is entitled to recover the full attorney’s fees stipulated in the note if their reasonableness is not questioned by the defendants and it appears that the involuntary plaintiff has incurred no legal expense in the prosecution of the action. The present suit was brought by C. H. Kuper, plaintiff, on two…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Ehlinger v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  4. First National Bank of Eagle Lake v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Torres v. Western Casualty and Surety CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Simpson v. MBank Dallas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. F. R. Hernandez Construction & Supply Co. v. National Bank of Commerce of BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Micrea, Inc. v. Eureka Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API