Legal Opinion

Imperial Irrigation Co. v. Jayne

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1911No. 2166PublishedCited by 84 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth District, in an appeal from Pecos County. Jayne sued the Irrigation Company for the recovery of land, and appealed from a judgment for defendant. This being reversed and judgment rendered fpr plaintiff, the Irrigation Company obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibrell

This suit was brought by Joe Jayne, as plaintiff, against the Imperial Irrigation-Company, A. D. Jamison and Bose Allison, as defendants, to recover section No. 2 of block No. 9, Houston & G. N. Ry. survey, in Pecos County, Texas, consisting of 591.15 acres, and for damages in the sum of $10,000, alleged to have resulted from the construction of a dam or embankment on the land sued for. There was a prayer for an injunction to restrain defendants from maintaining upon plaintiff’s land the dams, embankments, locks, gates, canals and flumes placed thereon by defendants, and to prevent' them from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Borden v. Trespalacios Rice & Irrigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Mills County v. Lampasas CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Winona & St. Peter Railroad v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Bradley v. New-York & New-Haven Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. Board of RegentsTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Key Western Life Insurance v. State Board of InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1961

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API