Strauss v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondent court to vacate its order quashing a subpoena duces tecum theretofore issued in a proceeding to perpetuate testimony under section 2084 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The points in controversy are these: (1) the sufficiency of petitioner’s pleading of the foundational premise for his demand for the production of the desired documentary evidence; and (2) the definiteness in scope of the subpoena duces tecum itself in relation to the constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure. (Const., art. I, §19.) A review…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Union Trust Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. Keith Railway Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Moeller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Copley v. CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Wemyss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.