Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. Sullivan
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 26, 1911No. 9715PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered November 21, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action upon a promissory note, after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
The respondent, as endorsee and holder, sued the appellants as makers of a promissory note which, with the endorsements thereon, was as follows:
“$400. Snohomish, Wash., Apr. 25, 1908.
“On demand, after date, for value received I (we) promise to pay to the order of Springfield Shingle Co. at the First National Bank in the city of Snohomish, the sum of Four hundred no-100 Dollars with interest thereon at the-rate of 8 per cent per annum from date until paid. The interest shall be paid at the expiration of every.......... and if default be made in the payment of any installment of interest when…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schmittler v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Walker v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- First National Bank v. LightnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Charlton v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Joergenson v. JoergensonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Main Bank of Chicago v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Sturgis National Bank v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Vogt v. HovanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Utah Lake Irr. Co. v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- People's Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.