Legal Opinion

Charlton v. Reed

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 8, 1883PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Woodlury Circuit Court. This is an action upon a promissory note for $60. Under the direction of the court, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Day, Oh. J.

— The amount in controversy being less than $100, the trial judge certified the questions of law upon which it is desirable to have the opinion of this court, as follows: “That the action was brought to recover the amount due upon a promissory note, of which the following is a true copy, to wit:

‘Postoeeice, Sargent, County oe "Woodbury, ‘60.-00. State oe Iowa, Township Liberty,

‘October 18,1880.

‘Twelve months after date (or before if made out of the sale of Drake’s Horse Hay Fork and Hay Carrier), I promise to pay to James 33. Drake, or bearer, Sixty Dollars, negotiable and payable…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walker v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Knoxville National Bank v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Nazro v. FullerNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  4. White v. HassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  5. Smith v. MarlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Des Moines Savings Bank v. ArthurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Nickell v. BradshawOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. First National Bank of Grand Haven v. ZeimsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API