Legal Opinion

Utah Lake Irr. Co. v. Allen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1924No. 4168PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

In its complaint plaintiff sought to recover judgment against defendants on two promissory notes. Judgment was entered on one note in favor of plaintiff and upon the other in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals. The note upon which judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff is not involved in this appeal, and will not be further considered.

The note in question is dated January 27, 1921, and by its terms was made payable to G. M. Richards or order “on or before March 27, 1921.” Richards, before the note became due, in due course, sold. and delivered the note to plaintiff. He indorsed the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Peoples Bus LineSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
  3. Strand Amusement Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. National Bank of Newbury v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sturgis National Bank v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hubbard v. Robert B. Wallace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Pelueger v. Broadway Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. The People v. GouldIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Balch v. EnglishAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API