Legal Opinion
City of Palo Alto v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 23, 2016No. H041407PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPremo, J.
*1278Since 1978, article V of the City of Palo Alto's (hereafter, City) charter provided that impasses in negotiations regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment for the City's police and firefighters would be submitted to binding interest arbitration. In 2011, the Palo Alto City Council (City Council) voted to place on the ballot for the upcoming election a measure that repealed this binding interest arbitration provision. Real party in interest the International Association of Firefighters, Local 1319, AFL-CIO (IAFF) filed an unfair practice charge with the Public…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Boling v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Behunin v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Boatworks, LLC v. City of Alameda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Boling v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Superior Court of Fresno Cnty. v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.