Legal Opinion
Friends of H Street v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1993No. C013852PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
This is the second of two appeals challenging the manner in which the City of Sacramento (the City) maintains and manages H Street. In Hutchinson v. City of Sacramento (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 791 [21 Cal.Rptr.2d 779], an appeal resulting from two property owners’ successful petition for writ of mandate, we held the City’s authority to decide whether and when to reevaluate an established speed limit implicated its legislative power and was not subject to review as a ministerial act. We reversed the order issuing the writ and remanded the matter to the trial court with…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Friends Of" B" Street v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Adams v. MHC Colony Park Ltd. PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- ZACK'S, INC. v. City of SausalitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Jacobs Farm/Del Cabo, Inc. v. Western Farm Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.