Legal Opinion
Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 3, 2008No. Slip Op. 08-73. Court No. 07-00001PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff, Totes-Isotoner Corporation (“Totes”), a U.S. importer of men’s gloves, challenges the constitutionality of the tariff rate imposed on its imports. Totes claims that by setting out different tariff rates for certain “Men’s” gloves and other gloves, the Tariff Schedule violates Totes’ right to equal protection under the law because it discriminates on the basis of gender and/or age.
The Defendant United States asks the Court to dismiss Totes’ complaint, claiming that the Court does not have jurisdiction over this matter for two reasons: (l)the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Rack Room Shoes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Alden Leeds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.