Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Insurance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 13, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-107; Court 07-00067PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Chief Judge:
In its Amended Complaint, ECF No. 29, Plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) asks the court to void or, in the alternative, to discharge certain bonds securing duties on entries of frozen cooked crawfish tailmeat from the People’s Republic of China (“China”). Defendant U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) moves, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) of this Court, to dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim.
As explained below, the first and second causes of action stated in Plaintiffs complaint will be dismissed without…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- United States v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2017